心理发展与教育 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 410-416.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.04.04

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会距离与合作指数对不同年龄青少年合作行为影响的差异

张磊1, 徐碧波1, 丁璐2   

  1. 1. 湖北大学心理学系, 武汉 430062;
    2. 湖北职业技术学院, 孝感 432000
  • 出版日期:2017-07-15 发布日期:2017-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 徐碧波,E-mail:bluewave2002@163.com E-mail:bluewave2002@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    湖北省“十二五”教育规划课题2015年重点项目(2015ZA032);湖北省中小学素质教育中心开放课题(090/044035)。

The Different Effects on Cooperative Behavior among Teenagers by the Social Distance and the Cooperation Index

ZHANG Lei1, XU Bibo1, DING Lu2   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062;
    2. Hubei Polytechnic Institute, Xiaogan 432000
  • Online:2017-07-15 Published:2017-07-15

摘要: 本研究采用重复囚徒困境实验范式,考察了社会距离和合作指数对不同年龄青少年(初中生、高中生和大学生,且每个年龄段的被试数为40名)在博弈决策中的合作行为的影响。结果发现:(1)随着年龄的增加,青少年合作行为的总体趋势表现为下降;(2)社会距离对大学生的合作行为的正向作用显著,而中学生的合作行为却不受其影响;(3)个体合作率会受到合作指数的促进作用,但这种促进作用在大学生中表现的更为显著。即随年龄增长,个体会更少的采取合作行为,并且个体是否采取合作在更大程度上基于当前博弈中的收支情况和与博弈对象之间的社会距离。

关键词: 青少年, 囚徒困境, 合作行为, 社会距离, 合作指数

Abstract: The Prisoner's Dilemma paradigm was employed to discover the development characteristics of teenagers' cooperative behaviors. Participants were directed to play Prisoner's Dilemma Game with same-gender friend and stranger respectively. In the procedure, different payoff matrix was randomly presented based on 9 levels of CI (0.1~0.9). The reward entirely depended on outcome of the game. Cooperative rate was computed from frequency of cooperation as a measurement in each conditions. The results of the REGRESSION and ANOVA revealed that:(1)teenagers' cooperative behaviors was showed a increasing tendency with an increasing age;(2) Social Distance had a large influence on college students' cooperative behaviors, but little on middle school students;(3)The individual cooperate would be promoted by CI, which was more obvious for college students than middle school students. The stage differences appeared during the teenager's cooperative behavior development.

Key words: teenager, prisoner's dilemma, cooperative behaviors, social distance, cooperation index

中图分类号: 

  • B844

Akerlof, G. A. (1997). Social distance and social decisions. Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society, 65(5), 1005-1027.

Angerer, S., ATZLE-Rutzler, D., Lergetporer, P., & Sutter, M. (2013). Childrens Cooperation and Discrimination in a Bilingual Province:Working Paper.

Balliet, D., Wu J., & De Dreu, C. K. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation:A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1556.

Byrnes J P(1988). The nature and development of decision-making:a self-regulation model. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

Binzel, C., & Fehr, D. (2013). Social distance and trust:Experimental evidence from a slum in Cairo. Journal of Development Economics, 103, 99-106.

Bohnet, I., & Frey, B. S. (1999). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games:Comment. The American Economic Review, 89(1), 335-339.

Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., (1979).Prospect Theory:A analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2),263-292

Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Fudenberg, D., & Nowak, M. A. (2008). Winners don't punish. Nature, 452(7185), 348-351.

Engelmann, J. M., Over, H., Herrmann, E., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Young children care more about their reputation with ingroup members and potential reciprocators. Developmental Science, 16(6), 952-958.

Fan, C. P. (2000). Teaching children cooperation-An application of experimental game theory. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 41(3), 191-209.

Fitzgerald, M. A., & Frankie, G. H. (1982). The effects of Age and Communication on Cooperation and Competition in Children and Adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 141(2), 295-296.

García, C., Rivera, N., & Greenfield, P. M. (2015). The decline of cooperation, the rise of competition:developmental effects of long-term social change in Mexico. International Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 6-11.

Geletkanycz, M. A. (1997). The salience of 'culture's consequences':The effects of cultural values on top executive commitment to the status quo. Strategic Management Journal, 18(8), 615-634.

Gutierrez-Roig, M., Gracia-Lazaro, C., Perello, J., Moreno, Y., & Sanchez, A. (2014). Transition from reciprocal cooperation to persistent behaviour in social dilemmas at the end of adolescence. Nat Commun, 5, 4362.

Hammerstein, P. (2003). Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation:MIT press.

Jackson, M., & Tisak, M. S. (2001). Is prosocial behaviour a good thing? Developmental changes in children's evaluations of helping, sharing, cooperating, and comforting. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19(3), 349-367.

Klaczynski, P. A. (2000). Motivated scientific reasoning biases, epistemological beliefs, and theory polarization:A two-process approach to adolescent cognition. Child Development, 71(5), 1347-1366.

Murphy, S., & Faulkner, D. (2000). Learning to collaborate:Can young children develop better communication strategies through collaboration with a more popular peer. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(4), 389-404.

Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1965). Prisoner's dilemma:A study in conflict and cooperation (Vol. 165):University of Michigan press.

Piaget. J.(1999). Judgment and reasoning in the child. London:Routledge, (First published in 1928 by Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd)

Schelling, T. C. (1968). The life you save may be your own.

Smith, A., & Nicholson, J. S. (1887). An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.T. Nelson and Sons.

Wedekind, C. (1998). Give and ye shall be recognized. Science, 280(5372), 2070.

陈单枝, 朱莉琪. (2005). 儿童的决策行为. 心理科学进展,13(05), 606-613.

陈璟, 孙昕怡, 李红. (2012). 儿童完全信息最后通牒博弈决策的发展. 心理与行为研究,10(02), 104-114.

陈欣, 叶浩生. (2007). 两难中合作行为研究的回顾和展望. 心理科学进展,15(05), 743-748.

李晶, 朱莉琪. (2014). 高功能孤独症儿童的合作行为. 心理学报,46(09), 1301-1316.

李艾丽莎, 张庆林.(2006).决策的选择偏好研究述评.心理科学进展,4,618-624.

卢洋, 张磊, 徐碧波.(2016)合作指数与社会距离对合作行为的影响.心理科学, 2,435-440.

韩振华, 乐国安. (2008). 囚徒选择和中国人的义. 应用心理学,14(1), 3-7.

庞维国, 程学超. (2001). 9~16岁儿童的合作倾向与合作意图的发展研究. 心理发展与教育,1, 31-35.

孙昕怡, 陈璟, 李红, 李秀丽. (2009). 合作指数与描述方式对儿童囚徒困境博弈中合作行为的影响. 心理发展与教育,1, 27-33.

赵俊茹, 李幼穗. (2003). 交流方式对儿童青少年合作行为影响的发展研究. 心理科学,26(03), 545-546.

朱琳, 张庆林. (2014). 决策的发展性研究进展. 西南师范大学学报,30(04),60-64.
[1] 陈慧, 何婷, 唐远琼, 唐怡欣, 陆风勇, 蔺秀云. 共情与青少年内外化问题的关系及影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 439-446.
[2] 牛凯宁, 李梅, 张向葵. 青少年友谊质量和主观幸福感的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 407-418.
[3] 陈子循, 冯映雪, 宋文莉, 刘霞. 亲子分离与青少年同伴侵害和抑郁的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 429-438.
[4] 张云运, 陈嘉仪, 杨妙, 任萍, 刘思辰. 父母学业参与、父母学业压力与青少年早期的学业投入:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 211-221.
[5] 张豪, 马田雨, 王媛, 李彩娜. 初中生友谊质量与孤独感的变化轨迹:一项多元潜变量增长模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 230-239.
[6] 彭顺, 牛更枫, 汪夏, 张红坡, 胡祥恩. 父母自主支持对青少年积极情绪适应的影响:基本心理需要满足的中介与调节作用模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 240-248.
[7] 吴晗, 魏昶, 陆惠诗, 赖伟平, 邢锦涛, 喻承甫, 甄霜菊, 张卫. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁:社会退缩的中介作用与师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 249-256.
[8] 邱依雯, 娄熠雪, 雷怡. 青少年抑郁:基于社会支持的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 288-297.
[9] 赵云燕, 于荔, 连帅磊, 姚良爽, 孙晓军. 被动性社交网站使用与青少年体像烦恼的关系:体像比较和体像自我差异的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 34-45.
[10] 祁迪, 林悦, 刘勤学. “打”出来的手机成瘾?父母粗暴养育对青少年智能手机成瘾的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 677-685.
[11] 杜萱, 林嘉懿, 陈黎静. 儿童和青少年的空间—时间隐喻图式[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 513-519.
[12] 周钰, 吴琴, 韩宪国, 崔佳蕾, 翟梦真, 邹何辉, 胡松龄, 崔丽莹. 初中生同伴圈子的发展及其对合作倾向、预期和行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 555-562.
[13] 陈子循, 王晖, 冯映雪, 刘霞. 同伴侵害对留守青少年主观幸福感的影响:自尊和社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 605-614.
[14] 韩燕, 徐芬. 儿童青少年时期加工速度和执行功能在流体智力发展中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 394-405.
[15] 王亚丹, 孔繁昌, 赵改, 张星杰, 周博, 唐凤, 周宗奎. 父母教养方式影响青少年感恩:心理特权和观点采择的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 422-429.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!