心理发展与教育 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 1-11.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.01.01
• 认知与社会性发展 • 下一篇
于晓1, 张和颐2, 戚玥3,4, 陈英和3,4, 刘浩宁1, 赵煜燨1, 乔学文5
YU Xiao1, ZHANG Heyi2, QI Yue3,4, CHEN Yinghe3,4, LIU Haoning1, ZHAO Yuxi1, QIAO Xuewen5
摘要: 本研究采用负启动范式,设置不同的认知负荷任务,探究抑制控制在儿童和成人类比映射中的作用。实验一中,31名7岁儿童、33名10岁儿童和34名成人完成高认知负荷的相对大小类比映射的负启动任务。结果表明,所有群体均出现负启动效应,且负启动效应随年龄增长而减小。实验二中,30名7岁儿童、30名10岁儿童和32名成人完成低认知负荷的相对大小类比映射的负启动任务。结果表明,所有群体均出现负启动效应,但负启动效应无显著年龄差异。本研究的结果揭示了抑制控制和认知负荷在类比映射发展中的重要作用。
中图分类号:
Aïte, A., Berthoz, A., Vidal, J., Roëll, M., Zaoui, M., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2016). Taking a third-person perspective requires inhibitory control:Evidence from a developmental negative priming study.Child Development, 87(6), 1825-1840. Borst, G., Poirel, N., Pineau, A., Cassotti, M., & Houdé, O. (2013). Inhibitory control efficiency in a Piaget-like class-inclusion task in school-age children and adults:A developmental negative priming study. Developmental Psychology, 49(7), 1366-1374. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition & Instruction, 8(4), 293-332. Chuderska, A., & Chuderski, A. (2014). Two facets of cognitive control in analogical mapping:The role of semantic interference resolution and goal-driven structure selection. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(3), 352-371. Clement, C. A., Harris, R. C., Burns, B. M., & Weatherholt, T. N. (2010). An eye-tracking analysis of the effect of prior comparison on analogical mapping.Current Psychology, 29(4), 273-287. Doumas, L. A., Morrison, R. G., & Richland, L. E. (2010). Differences in development of analogy across cultures:A computational account. In S. Ohlsson (Ed.),Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.2338-2343). Cognitive Science Society. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3:A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. Forbus, K.D., Gentner, D., Markman, A. B., & Ferguson, R. W. (1998). Analogy just looks like high level perception:Why a domain-general approach to analogical mapping is right. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 10(2), 231-257. Forster,S., & Lavie, N. (2008). Failures to ignore entirely irrelevant distractors:The role of load. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied, 14(1), 73-83. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping:A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155-170. Glady, Y., French, R. M., & Thibaut, J. P. (2017). Children's failure in analogical reasoning tasks:A problem of focus of attention and information integration?Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 707.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00707 Gogtay, N., Giedd, J. N., Lusk, L., Hayashi, K. M., Greenstein, D., Vaituzis, A. C., … Thompson, P. (2004). Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(21), 8174-8179. Gotseva-Balgaranova, K., & Mutafchieva, M. (2018). Does training in inhibition and working memory influence analogical reasoning and theory of mind in young children? In T. T. Rogers, M. Rau, X. Zhu, & C. W. Kalish (Eds.), Proceeding of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society(pp.1735-1740).Austin, TX:Cogntive Science Society. Hofstadter, D., & Sander, E. (2013).Surfaces and essence:Analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. New York:Basic Books. Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2014). Measuring inhibitory control in children and adults:Brain imaging and mental chronometry. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(7), Article 616.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00616 Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2015). Evidence for an inhibitory-control theory of the reasoning brain.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Article 148.https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00148 Houdé, O., Pineau, A., Leroux, G., Poirel, N., Perchey, G., Lanoë, C., … Mazoyer, B. (2011). Functional magnetic resonance imaging study of Piaget's conservation-of-number task in preschool and school-age children:A neo-Piagetian approach. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(3), 332-346. Jiang, R., Li, X., Xu, P., & Chen, Y. (2019). Inhibiting intuitive rules in a geometry comparison task:Do age level and math achievement matter?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 186, 1-16. Jiang, R., Li, X., Xu, P., & Lei, Y. (2020). Do teachers need to inhibit heuristic Bias in mathematics problem-solving? Evidence from a negative-priming study. Current Psychology.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01209-x Jiang, R., Li, X., Xu, P., Zhong, L., & Lei, Y. (2019). The role of inhibitory control in overcoming English written-verb inflection errors:Evidence from Chinese ESL learners. Current Psychology, 40, 5256-5266. Keane, M. T. (1997). What makes an analogy difficult? The effects of order and causal structure on analogical mapping.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 946-967. Knowlton, B. J., Morrison, R. G., Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2012). A neurocomputational system for relational reasoning.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(7), 373-381. Krawczyk, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Hummel, J. E. (2004). Structural constraints and object similarity in analogical mapping and inference.Thinking & Reasoning, 10(1), 85-104. Lanoë, C., Vidal, J., Lubin, A., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2016). Inhibitory control is needed to overcome written verb inflection errors:Evidence from a developmental negative priming study. Cognitive Development, 37, 18-27. Lavie, N., & Fox, E. (2000).The role of perceptual load in negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 26(3), 1038-1052. Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics, 56(2), 183-197. Linzarini, A., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2015). When Stroop helps Piaget:An inter-task positive priming paradigm in 9-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 71-82. Lubin, A., Vidal, J., Lanoë, C., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2013). Inhibitory control is needed for the resolution of arithmetic word problems:A developmental negative priming study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 701-708. Luna, B., Padmanabhan, A., & O'Hearn, K. (2010). What has fMRI told us about the development of cognitive control through adolescence? Brain and Cognition, 72(1), 101-113. Megías, M., Ortells, J. J., Noguera, C., Carmona, I., & Marí-Beffa, P. (2020). Semantic negative priming from an ignored single-prime depends critically on prime-mask inter-stimulus interval and working memory capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1227.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01227 Mix, K. S. (2008). Children's numerical equivalence judgments:crossmapping effects.Cognitive Development, 23(1), 191-203. Murphy, G., Groeger, J. A., & Greene, C. M. (2016). Twenty years of load theory:Where are we now, and where should we go next? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1316-1340. Ortells, J. J., Carmen, N., Dolores, A., Encarna, C., & George, H. (2016).Individual differences in working memory capacity modulates semantic negative priming from single prime words. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1286.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01286 Pritchard, V. E., & Neumann, E. (2004). Negative priming effects in children engaged in nonspatial tasks:Evidence for early development of an intact inhibitory mechanism.Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 191-203. Pritchard, V. E., & Neumann, E. (2009). Avoiding the potential pitfalls of using negative priming tasks in developmental studies:Assessing inhibitory control in children, adolescents, and adults.Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 272-283. Rattermann, M. J., & Gentner, D. (1998). The effect of language on similarity:The use of relational labels improves young children's performance in a mapping task. In K. Holyoak, D. Gentner, & B. Kokinov (Eds.),Advances in analogy research:Integration of theory and data from the cognitive, computational, and neural sciences (pp. 274-282). Sophia:New Bulgarian University. Rattermann, M. J., Gentner, D., DeLoache, J. (1987, April).Young children's use of relational similarity in a transfer task. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore. Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Children's development of analogical reasoning:Insights from scene analogy problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94(3), 249-273. Schumacher, R. M., & Gentner, D. (1988).Transfer of training as analogical mapping. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, 18(4), 592-600. Siegler, R. S. (2007). Cognitive variability.Developmental Science, 10, 104-109. Simms, N. K., Frausel, R. R., & Richland, L. E. (2018). Working memory predicts children's analogical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 160-177. Sternberg, R. J. (1977).Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84(4), 353-378. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design.Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295-312. Thibaut, J. P., & French, R. M. (2016). Analogical reasoning, control and executive functions:A developmental investigation with eye-tracking. Cognitive Development, 38, 10-26. Thibaut, J. P., French, R., & Vezneva, M. (2010). Cognitive load and semantic analogies:Searching semantic space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(4), 569-574. Vuilleumier, P., Schwartz, S., Duhoux, S., Dolan, R. J., & Driver, J. (2005). Selective attention modulates neural substrates of repetition priming and "implicit" visual memory:Suppressions and enhancements revealed by fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(8), 1245-60. Waltz, J. A., Lau, A., Grewal, S. K., & Holyoak, K. J. (2000). The role of working memory in analogical mapping. Memory & Cognition, 28(7), 1205-1212. 陈丽君, 刘丽敏, 林岳阳, 张玲燕. (2021). 虚拟学习环境下图形加工的认知负荷研究. 心理发展与教育, 37(5), 619-627. 费广洪, 王淑娟. (2014). 3~11岁儿童类比推理发展的研究. 心理学探新, 34(6), 493-498. 付馨晨, 李晓东. (2017). 认知抑制——问题解决研究的新视角. 心理科学, 40(1), 58-63. 江荣焕, 李晓东. (2017). 比例推理的过度使用及其认知机制:一项发展性的负启动研究. 心理学报, 49(6), 745-758. 李梦文, 王登, 贺雯. (2021). 消极元刻板印象激活对老年人认知表现的影响. 心理科学, 44(2), 384-490. 魏萍, 周晓林. (2005). 从知觉负载理论来理解选择性注意. 心理科学进展, 13(4), 413-420. 谢和平, 安婧, 王福兴. (2017). 多媒体学习中的图文整合:同步化线索和学习者经验的作用. 心理科学, 40(5), 82-88. 于晓, 王红梅, 陈英和, 刘瑞曙, 韩瑽瑽, 韩敏,…刘静. (2020). 分心抑制和关系整合对学前儿童类比推理的影响. 心理发展与教育, 36(4), 385-393. 于晓. (2021). 执行功能对个体类比推理的影响:发展的视角 (博士学位论文). 北京师范大学. |
[1] | 苏志强, 马郑豫. 童年期友谊质量与孤独感的纵向发展关系:应对方式的共变作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 31-39. |
[2] | 李星凯, 武峻生, 姚筱彤, 刘映珊, 任杰, 陈穗清. 自闭症和智力障碍儿童行为问题与父母焦虑的关系:育儿压力的中介作用与领悟社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 77-84. |
[3] | 徐富明, 黄龙. 贫困对儿童心理健康的影响及其内在机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 132-139. |
[4] | 张陆, 黄雪芳, 游志麒, 叶娜. 儿童期虐待对大学生公正世界信念的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 804-812. |
[5] | 何文广, 杨谢兰. 汉语学龄前儿童主、宾关系从句认知特点及语义因素效应的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 667-674. |
[6] | 余习德. 儿童时间认知研究范式:困境与超越[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 749-760. |
[7] | 江盈颖, 安静, 马丽, 朱莉琪. 8~15岁儿童贫富观的发展特点及其与成人的比较[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 466-474. |
[8] | 薛笑然, 黄碧娟, 李红霞, 赵晓萌, 司继伟. 小学儿童数学态度与数学成就的纵向联系:学业拖延和数学元认知的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 520-529. |
[9] | 殷锦绣, 蔺秀云, 刘伟, 王玉龙, 彭勃. 教养方式的母子感知差异与儿童抑郁的关系:母子依恋的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 556-565. |
[10] | 张春阳, 徐慰. 儿童期创伤与有留守经历大学生负性情绪:心理韧性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 584-591. |
[11] | 史梦梦, 任桂琴, 吕潇潇, 张巧, 李海娇. 儿童理解监控的即时加工过程[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 592-599. |
[12] | 王燕青, 杨晓梦, 赵婷婷, 高春颍, 张洋, 赵庆柏, 王福兴, 胡祥恩. 分段是视频学习的有效方式吗?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 600-608. |
[13] | 王斯麒, 赵彬璇, 吴红, 刘伟. 婚姻质量对儿童亲社会行为的影响:父母积极情绪表达和教养行为的链式中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 323-330. |
[14] | 谢韵梓, 吴继霞, 王诗成, 阳泽. 儿童期情感忽视对大学生抑郁的影响:控制感与情绪调节自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 407-417. |
[15] | 吴国婧, 程雪林, 李叶, 白荣, 邢淑芬, 李玉华. 学前期儿童执行功能和语言的双向关系:社会经济地位的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 186-194. |
|